Inspection Report Writing

Findings get written on whatever is at hand, paper, word-processor files, text messages, so reports arrive in inconsistent formats with missing dates, locations, or results, and someone in the office retypes them.

• Field technicians
• Report writers

Used while the inspection findings are being documented, the writing of the report itself.

• Linked work request
• Report number
• NDT method and inspection date
• Inspection location
• Findings, conclusion, recommendations
• Overall result (pass / conditional / fail / inconclusive)

• Create a draft report linked to its work request, customer and technician context comes with it
• Record inspection date, location, findings, conclusion, and recommendations
• Set the overall result supported by the findings
• Save drafts and pick them back up later

• Report number, work request, and method are required before saving
• Findings, inspection date, and location are required before submission
• Drafts are private to your organization, never customer-visible

Draft

Incomplete or unsubmitted, not in the review queue.

Submitted

Complete and handed to review.

1. 01

   Input

   Approved scope and records arrive

2. 02

   User action

   Create a draft report linked to its work request, customer and technician context comes with it

3. 03

   Validation

   Report number, work request, and method are required before saving

4. 04

   Output

   The module's recorded outcome

5. 05

   Next step

   Handed to Field Inspections (submission)

A complete draft report, ready to submit into the review queue.

Fully configurable method-specific form templates and per-reading photo attachment are planned; today findings are captured in the structured fields shown above.